/* customized css */
.tdi_2_6c6{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_4_534{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_6_c53{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_8_3c3{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Hello everybody, I’m Daphne, a 13-year-old going into eighth grade.
I’m writing to match “common” Khan Academy (no AI) to Khanmigo (powered by GPT4), utilizing three of my very own made-up standards.
They’re: effectivity, effectiveness, and enjoyability. Effectivity is how briskly I’m able to cowl a math subject and get fundamental understanding. Effectiveness is my high quality of understanding—the distinction between fundamental and superior understanding. And the ultimate one—most vital to youngsters and possibly least vital to adults who make youngsters study math—is enjoyability.
Reviewing Khan Academy
Let’s begin with “common” Khan Academy to see the way it matches these classes. Khan Academy is a mixture of apply drawback units and video explainers. Only for private context, I meet with a math tutor as soon as per week, and a few weeks I get assigned one or two 30-minute drawback units as homework. I’ve most likely labored via greater than 50 of those up to now couple years.
By way of effectivity, Khan Academy is absolutely strong: 5.5 out of 10. Should you perceive the subject, like including fractions, then you are able to do these in a breeze, and the additional apply enhances your comprehension of the subject. Nevertheless, for those who get confused, then what? You possibly can click on on trace. However doing that comes at a price: you possibly can’t get “credit score” anymore for getting a proper reply by yourself.
Should you do click on on a improper reply, you get a grey dot that symbolizes improper. That bothers me. Should you’re a perfectionist like myself, it’s attainable to spend half-hour over that one query you’re not sure of, not desirous to see the grey dot. After a improper reply, you possibly can click on the get assist button and obtain a prolonged rationalization on how you must’ve achieved the issue. You possibly can then transfer on and apply the information you discovered to the subsequent query.
Okay, now comes effectiveness. Once more, my score is 5.5 out of 10. An everyday Khan train isn’t superb at educating you new issues—the trace and rationalization aren’t sufficient for those who’re actually confused—however is great at reinforcing what you realize. Now, it might be unfair for me to say this; I notice there are movies to show a brand new subject. Me and my pals discover them boring—maybe efficient, however I by no means use them. On Commonsense Media evaluations, it looks like a number of youngsters really feel this fashion.
Final however, in my thoughts, actually not least, enjoyability: 6 out of 10. Simply throughout, Khan feels the identical as a traditional drawback set at school. Let’s be trustworthy, talking for almost all of youngsters, math is a chore. (Sorry, Dad.) However Khan tends to be fairly easy at serving to you get this chore achieved, and for youths like me that simply need to get the work over with, Khan isn’t that dangerous. Not too particular and maybe a bit bland, however not horrible.
All in all, Khan Academy “Unique Recipe” will get a strong score of 6 out of 10.
/* customized css */
.tdi_10_c00{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_12_955{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Interacting with Khanmigo
Shifting on, let’s take a look at Khanmigo. My dad gave me this instruction: attempt to study a subject that I have no idea. So I selected scientific notation.
First, let me present you what Migo is. Khanmigo requested me:
/* customized css */
.tdi_14_56a{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_16_506{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 3000?
/* customized css */
.tdi_18_c47{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_20_00a{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
3^1000
/* customized css */
.tdi_22_666{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_24_cc7{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s my take: Scientific notation is a means of expressing numbers which are too huge or too small to be conveniently written in decimal kind. It’s written as a product of a quantity between 1 and 10 and an influence of 10.
So, for the quantity 3000, we are able to break it down like this:
3000 = 3 * 1000
We all know that 1000 is 10 to the facility of three (as a result of 101010 = 1000). So we are able to rewrite 1000 as 10^3.
So, 3000 in scientific notation is 3 * 10^3.
Evaluating this together with your reply, it seems to be like there was a little bit of a mix-up. You wrote 3^1000, which suggests 3 raised to the facility of 1000, a quantity a lot bigger than 3000. That’s okay, although! Errors are a part of studying.
Now, let’s transfer to the subsequent query.
Query 2 of 10:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 0.004?
Bear in mind, you possibly can ask for a touch for those who want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_26_fa4{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_28_116{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
that was to many elements can u go over that once more with much less phrases
/* customized css */
.tdi_30_535{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_32_954{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Certain, I can simplify it!
For the quantity 3000:
• Break it into 3 and 1000.
• Write 1000 as 10^3 (as a result of 101010 = 1000).
• So, 3000 = 3 * 10^3 in scientific notation.
Now, for the subsequent query:
What’s 0.004 in scientific notation?
Bear in mind, you possibly can ask for a touch for those who want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_34_67a{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_36_f50{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Okay, reader, Daphne right here once more. What do you suppose occurred subsequent? Was I in a position to get the subsequent query proper? Let’s discover out.
/* customized css */
.tdi_38_9dd{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_40_877{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
i dont know the way to do that.
/* customized css */
.tdi_42_cc5{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_44_044{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
No drawback in any respect! Right here’s a touch:
When a quantity is lower than 1 and we need to write it in scientific notation, we use adverse exponents.
For instance, 0.1 might be written as 1 * 10^-1.
Now, attempt to write 0.004 in scientific notation.
/* customized css */
.tdi_46_a46{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_48_945{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
4 * 10^-0.01
/* customized css */
.tdi_50_c15{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_52_555{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Okay, reader. Think about you have been my human tutor. What would you say at this level for those who noticed my reply above?
Properly, right here is Migo’s response.
/* customized css */
.tdi_54_5a5{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_56_cb5{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s how I’d do it:
When now we have a quantity like 0.004, we need to transfer the decimal level to the correct till now we have a quantity between 1 and 10. On this case, we transfer the decimal level 3 locations to the correct to get 4.
Every time we transfer the decimal level to the correct, we subtract 1 from the exponent of 10. So, since we moved the decimal level 3 locations, our exponent is -3.
So, 0.004 in scientific notation is 4 * 10^-3.
Evaluating this together with your reply, it seems to be like there was a mix-up with the exponent. You wrote 10^-0.01, however it ought to be 10^-3. That’s okay, although! Errors are a part of studying.
Now, let’s transfer to the subsequent query.
Query 3 of 10:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 70000?
Bear in mind, you possibly can ask for a touch for those who want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_58_545{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_60_06c{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
once more, too many phrases. act as if im not very sensible
/* customized css */
.tdi_62_c85{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_64_355{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
I’m certain you’re sensible! Let’s break it down.
For 0.004:
• Transfer decimal 3 locations proper to get 4.
• This provides us 4 * 10^-3.
Now, for 70000 in scientific notation:
• Break it into ? and 10000
• Write 10000 as 10^?.
• So, 70000 = ? * 10^?.
Are you able to fill within the “?” to write down 70000 in scientific notation?
/* customized css */
.tdi_66_565{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_68_79c{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
7
/* customized css */
.tdi_70_095{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_72_a4b{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s my take:
You’re proper concerning the first half! The quantity we’re working with is 7.
For the quantity 70000:
• We break it into 7 and 10000.
• We write 10000 as 10^4 (as a result of 101010*10 = 10000).
• So, 70000 = 7 * 10^4 in scientific notation.
Evaluating this together with your reply, you bought the primary half proper! The quantity we’re working with is certainly 7. However keep in mind, we additionally want to specific the variety of zeros as an influence of 10. On this case, it’s 10^4.
You’re doing nice! Let’s transfer on to the subsequent query.
Query 4 of 10:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 0.0008?
Bear in mind, it’s okay to ask for a touch for those who want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_74_559{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_76_795{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
8 * 10^-4
/* customized css */
.tdi_78_9c8{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_80_53c{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s how I’d do it:
When now we have a quantity like 0.0008, we need to transfer the decimal level to the correct till now we have a quantity between 1 and 10. On this case, we transfer the decimal level 4 locations to the correct to get 8.
Every time we transfer the decimal level to the correct, we subtract 1 from the exponent of 10. So, since we moved the decimal level 4 locations, our exponent is -4.
So, 0.0008 in scientific notation is 8 * 10^-4.
Evaluating this together with your reply, it seems to be such as you received it precisely proper! Nice job.
/* customized css */
.tdi_82_050{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_84_c23{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Reviewing Khanmigo
Okay, reader, Daphne right here once more. Now listed here are my rankings of Migo.
For effectivity, Khanmigo is above Khan Common. 6.5 out of 10 (versus 5.5 out of 10).
If the bot’s response is just too lengthy, you possibly can alter it. (Simply ask, “Are you able to simplify that for me?”) If the issue is just too straightforward, the bot could make the subsequent one more durable. You possibly can really study much more in quite a bit much less time. The one half that bothered me was that typically it took some time for the responses to load, so I used to be sitting there bored ready for a bit.
For effectiveness, not solely are you able to study much more in quite a bit much less time, however you possibly can study much more in depth. It’s fairly completely different from common Khan within the that Khan Unique is just like the work a tutor would assign you, and Migo is like an precise tutor. You possibly can ask questions, starting from wanting kind of information. So, for effectiveness: 7.5 out of 10 (versus 5.5 out of 10).
And as for enjoyability, I’d say youngsters’ solutions would differ fairly a bit. Some would benefit from the participating, thought-provoking elements, whereas others would slightly simply do work independently. Personally, I feel I really desire common Khan, which surprises me, however I assume on this uncommon state of affairs, I really just like the simplicity of standard Khan. Possibly I simply didn’t really feel like considering that tough. So, for enjoyability: 5 out of 10 for me.
All in all, Khanmigo will get an 8 out of 10 holistic score. Since you study quite a bit, shortly.
Conclusion
To conclude, Migo is sort of a trainer, and common Khan Drawback Units are like homework. So clearly you study extra from the trainer, however sometimes the trainer can ramble on. However homework that serves merely as apply for subjects you already discovered at school is admittedly a good device with its personal perks, even for those who is likely to be studying much less and the standard is decrease.
/* customized css */
.tdi_86_8a9{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_88_c40{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne Goldstein is an eighth grader at Watertown (Mass.) Center Faculty. She likes volleyball, psychology, and iced chai lattes.
The publish Evaluating On-line and AI-Assisted Studying: A Scholar’s View appeared first on Schooling Subsequent.
